ClearCourt of Protection Forms
Struggling with COP forms? We review what you've got, tell you exactly what's missing, and complete the forms for you.
Forms We Can Complete
COP1 — Main Application
The primary application form for deputyship or one-off decisions. We complete all sections accurately based on your information.
COP1A — Financial Details
Annex for property and financial affairs applications. Bank accounts, property, income, debts — all documented correctly.
COP4 — Deputy's Declaration
The declaration you sign as proposed deputy. We ensure it's completed properly and consistent with your COP1.
COP24 — Witness Statement
Supporting witness statement explaining the circumstances. We draft this in proper legal format.
Notification Forms
COP5, COP14, COP15, COP20A, COP20B — the forms required to notify relevant parties about your application.
COP3 — We Cannot Complete This
The COP3 is a mental capacity assessment. It must be completed by a qualified healthcare professional (GP, social worker, nurse, psychologist, or psychiatrist). Private assessments typically cost £400-£600.
Important: We Complete Forms, We Don't File Them
We are not solicitors. We complete and review your Court of Protection forms, but you must file them with the Court yourself. We provide clear instructions on how to submit your completed application.
Pricing
Payments processed securely by Stripe. MTN MoMo & Airtel Money accepted.
Not sure what information you need?
Don't worry — you don't need to understand the forms or know everything upfront. Just tell us what you know about your situation. We'll review it, tell you exactly what's missing, and ask the right questions to get everything we need. That's what we're here for.
Get in TouchWhen "Best Interest" Becomes a Weapon Against Families
Have you been affected by your council or the NHS abusing the use of best interest decisions?
You're not alone. Across the UK, thousands of families are being shut out, overruled, accused, and silenced — all in the name of "best interests."
This is what families tell us:
"We challenged the care home fees. Now we're being investigated for financial abuse."
"I've been banned from visiting my own father — for asking questions about his care."
"They moved my mother to a care home without telling us. They said it was in her best interest."
"They held a best interest meeting and didn't invite any family members."
"My parent wants to come home. The council says no — but they've never asked what she actually wants."
"I raised concerns about neglect. Now they're saying I'm the problem."
"They call us 'too involved' — as if caring about your own mother is suspicious."
This is not protection. This is control.
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 is meant to protect vulnerable adults. But too often, councils and NHS trusts use "best interest" decisions to:
- Exclude families who ask difficult questions
- Override the wishes of the person themselves
- Justify placements no one was consulted about
- Weaponise safeguarding referrals against families who push back
- Accuse loving relatives of "financial abuse" for questioning fees
- Silence anyone who challenges poor care
When you challenge fees — you're accused of abuse.
When you raise concerns — you're banned from visiting.
When you want your parent home — you're told you're not acting in their best interest.
The law is on your side.
Under the Mental Capacity Act, decision-makers have a legal duty to consult you. Best interest decisions must consider the person's wishes and the views of those who know them. Safeguarding referrals are meant to protect — not to punish families who ask questions.
If you've been shut out, falsely accused, or ignored — you have the right to challenge it.
We can help you fight back.
ClearDraft prepares:
- Formal complaints to councils and NHS trusts
- Responses to safeguarding allegations
- Letters challenging best interest decisions
- Letters disputing care home fees
- Court of Protection documents
No legal jargon. Documents drafted within 48 hours.
Read the full guide: How councils weaponise "best interest" decisions against families →
See the full case: Best Interest Decisions — A Government Weapon Against Families →